The Wrap; Australia's tour of India, 2017
The Wrap; Australia’s Tour of India,
2017 (Australian analysis)
Overs: 23.4
Steven
O’Keefe to Lokesh Rahul;
23.5: “Rahul
beautifully pushes a short of a length delivery off the backfoot towards
midwicket and gets the double, which gives India the win! Rahul is absolutely
pumped, jumps in ecstasy.”
With that,
Australia’s slightly inconsistent but extremely promising tour of India came to
an end. This series was one that promised a lot for Australia, but it just
wasn’t meant to be. After the first Test, they seemed to have lost the
momentum. It was only Steven Smith, who on a consistent basis showed that they
aren’t going down without a fight. Throughout the series, Australia seemed to
have gained control of the day’s play, but India seemed to get out of the
trouble by some absolutely brilliant individual performances. That is exactly
what Kohli has been emphasizing on for so long. When the chips are down, there
has always been somebody who has stepped up, and that is probably why India are
ranked number one.
Getting back
to this series, let’s start by talking where exactly Australia went wrong,
especially after the first Test. Firstly, Steven O’Keefe had been neutralized
by the Indians. After the first test, they had assessed themselves and worked
on their technique against left arm spin. It was evident from the way that they
tackled him in the 3 remaining tests. As Lyon was applying pressure, O’Keefe
was releasing it from the other end. Secondly, Warner not scoring runs was a
huge dent to the otherwise inexperienced Aussie batting line up. There was too
much pressure on the fragile middle order who, more often than not, crumbled.
It was too much to ask for, and Jadeja certainly did not make things any easier
for them. Warner, being a senior member of the team, had to score runs if
Australia were to win the series. He has been to India for a Test series back
in 2013, where he fared off a lot better than he did this time around. I had
mentioned earlier on this blog that the onus was on Smith, Warner and Shaun Marsh
to score majority of the runs, out of which only Smith was successfully able to
do so.
Though,
there are plenty of reasons as to why Australia shouldn’t be too disheartened
by the series loss. Matthew Renshaw batted very responsibly on most occasions
and showed that he is a long term prospect for Australia. The 21-year-old had
scores of 68, 31, 60, 5, 44, 15, 1 and 8 in the 4 match series. Sure, he will
need to work to convert those 60s to 100s, but he is a very promising batsman
and has shown great maturity on this tour. Matthew Wade too, showed a lot of grit in the last couple of matches. Coming into this tour, there was a lot of
doubt over his ability as a test batsman. I think it’s safe to say that the
critics have been silenced for now. Apart from these positive signs, obviously
Steve Smith’s efforts were monumental, but that was expected from a world class
batsman like him. All in all, Steve Smith will be a proud captain with this
bunch, and will look forward to taking this team to another level with all of
the promise, potential and talent that they possess. With the Ashes set for
later this year, the Australian fast bowling looks deadlier than ever; Pat
Cummins, Mitchell Starc, Josh Hazlewood and James Pattinson. If all of them are
fully fit, I don’t see why Australia won’t unleash them against the English
batting line up.
Now, let’s
have a look at where exactly Australia lost the plot. By that, I’m referring to
a couple of selection mistakes that they made in the course of this series.
Firstly, I felt that not selecting Usman Khawaja cost Australia a lot. He
should have replaced Marsh after the first Test. Except that one knock, Marsh
looked almost hopeless against the Indian spinners. In all other conditions,
Khawaja gets the place ahead of Marsh, but why not in India? Yes, he had a bad
tour of Sri Lanka, but he has improved a lot and scored tons of
runs against Pakistan and South Africa since then. The man was in red hot form
and not selecting him was a blunder of some sorts. The second selection mistake
was Glenn Maxwell. After the first couple of Tests, Glenn Maxwell was brought
into the playing XI for the injured Mitchell Marsh. Although he did score a
century, he did not bowl much. Stoinis could have bowled a lot more overs and he
is a more than good batsman. Also, he has spent an entire season with the Kings
XI Punjab in the IPL, so he is familiar with Indian conditions. Maxwell came in
as an all-rounder, but his bowling is just about good enough to be considered
as ‘part-time’. I don’t see Maxwell fitting in as a long term option for
Australia in the longest format, especially as an all-rounder. Stoinis should
be persisted with and should be given as many opportunities as Mitchell Marsh
has enjoyed as an all-rounder.
Concluding
this, it was a fantastic attempt from Australia to try and beat India in their
own fortress, something which other top teams have failed miserably in trying
to do. Coming into this tour, a lot of people including a few Australian
legends had predicted the worst for Australia. But Australia had pushed India to
their limits and beyond, which was commendable on their part. Going into the
Ashes later this year, the Australians will be filled with confidence against
England, who performed terribly themselves and gave no fight whatsoever to
India. Before this tour, I was of the opinion that the efforts by Alastair Cook
in 2012 were the best by a foreign Captain in India, but Steven Smith has come
very close to matching that in this tour. This series just wasn’t meant to be
for a very spirited Steven Smith, who led a young and potent Australian Team in
their quest to conquer India in their backyard.
Shaun Marsh did repay the selectors' faith by helping Australia save the Ranchi test.
ReplyDeleteMaxwell might be the X factor at the number 6 spot that the Aussies have been looking for ever since Michael Hussey retired.